Evaluating The Research Of Others - HIgher Education - HIGH STANDARD

Evaluating The Research Of Others - HIgher Education - HIGH STANDARD Evaluating The Research Of Others - HIgher Education - HIGH STANDARD ENGLISH WRITERS ONLY â€" Essay Example > Evaluating the Research of others - Higher Education IntroductionAdoption of technology in secondary schools has brought about gender differences in Saudi Arabia both in the public and private sectors. Female students get very anxious when using the computer and are a major problem in their adoption styles which poses as a big problem when they venture into their different careers and innovation. The two articles that I have chosen to use in my article review deal with computer and information technologies. These technologies are useful in our modern world because they have been introduced to various organizations in the globe. They make work easier and less complicated. It is essential for female students and workers to adopt their use because they will come in handy in future. Source and comments of the research articleThe research articles in this article review report are from the scholarly/academic/peer reviewed articles. The source of the articles is published by and for exp erts in the fields of study. The literary paper has its rules and regulations concerning publishing of articles. The most salient is that all articles must go through the peer review course of action done by widely recognized experts who evaluate the article. This paper is also a review process that seeks to build content, academic value, and scholarly soundness of the articles. Most of the articles, in scholarly journals present new, earlier unpublished investigate. Scholarly articles have imagination, authorship, are refereed (peer reviewed), have an intended audience, sponsorship, illustrations, publication frequency, and note the format and length of the article. Focus of researcher’s workIn most of the research projects, researchers have a stated goal that helps in guiding them through the whole process. For example, in the two articles chosen, the researchers are examining the effect brought about by technology (computers) among students in education institutions. All rese arch work begins with a problem, as it is the basis for any scholarly inquiry to draw intellectual curiosity. The researcher also has a series of questions that assist in formulating the hypothesis, eliciting thoughtful and profound revelations, and validity of whether the study has been investigated on what it was its intended  focus. The questions are viewed as cornerstones in removing the barriers to achieving qualitative data in the researcher’s work. Research should have a question that clearly states the background necessary to provide the researcher with a blueprint for further study of the problem. The problem will be useful to the supervisor so that the researcher can be given advice on how to carry out the project. The research problem is also crucial and should hold scientific community and culture who contribute to the research process. After stating the problem of the research, the findings should match the current field position. Description of data collectionThe re search article describes the structure of data collection, which is indispensable, for the research committee in understanding how the student tackles the problem. The activities and procedure that will result in cessation of the studies are stipulated at this point. Alternative methods can be used in researching one’s work, but the researcher should convince others that the method used is appropriate as it addresses the research question appropriately. This section needs to be clarified by the researcher who uses standard quantitative methods bearing in mind the design, participants, instruments, and procedures. The methodology describes, explains, and predicts the research phenomenon to be undertaken. Varieties of methods are used in this category, and the decision taken by a researcher depends on the analytical tools available for one to use. The researcher should leave room for the other researcher reviewing the article to use other methods, which gives them, alternative met hods in obtaining the same information (Rajasekar et al. , 2006, pp. 2).